A research experiment · from January 2027

Take the wheel

How much human work does a minor car accident really cost? Help us find out — and test whether AI can reduce that work without losing the quality of the accident record.

Nadezhda Minkova · University of National and World Economy, Business Faculty

Illustration: two drivers after a minor collision, both reporting the accident on their phones
Our two drivers are not alone

The work is real.
But the data can’t see it.

Administrative records capture dates, statuses and payments — but not the active human effort behind each accident report. Explaining fields, clarifying circumstances, re-entering data: that work stays invisible.

64.16% on average for Bulgaria (2021–2025)

Estimated residual share of motor TPL property claims not attributable to police-registered accidents. Model-based estimate, not a direct count of bilateral reports. Sources: FSC and Ministry of Interior; own calculations.

~2/3
Less effort, same quality?

How the experiment works

Pairs of participants document the same simulated accident — one as driver A, one as driver B. We compare standard reporting with AI-assisted reporting.

1

Watch

A short visual simulation of a minor accident. No list of facts — just what you see.

2

Take a role

You become driver A or driver B, working in a pair.

3

Report

Describe what happened — with standard reporting or with an AI assistant.

4

Done

We measure the effort it took and how complete and faithful the record is.

CONTROLStandard reporting
TREATMENTAI-assisted reporting
Four scenarios: Complete Missing Asymmetric Contradictory
How do we know it works?

Effort saved, quality kept

Less effort counts only if the quality of the information holds.

Human effort

  • Active human time H1 ↓
  • Number of operations H2 ↓

Information quality

  • Factual completeness H3 ↑
  • Contradiction detection
  • Faithfulness to statements H3 ≥
  • Correct reporting eligibility
What if?

What the AI does — and doesn’t

Listens to each driver separately

Each driver gives an independent statement. The AI extracts factual assertions and compares them.

Asks neutral questions

When something is missing, it asks. Silence is never treated as agreement.

No decision on fault

Original statements stay unchanged. If accounts materially contradict, bilateral reporting stops.

Next time, we’ll know what it cost them

Where we are

2026

Framework

The experimental framework is presented at ITEMA 2026.

From January 2027

Experiment

Participant pairs, four scenarios, standard vs. AI-assisted reporting.

Then

Results

A reusable method for researchers. A decision basis for insurers.

Back to the two drivers

Take the wheel

Want to be driver A or B — or help make the experiment happen? Get in touch.

ParticipantsTake part in a short simulated accident report.
PartnersInsurers, brokers and research teams interested in the study.

Nadezhda Minkova

University of National and World Economy
Business Faculty

nadezhda.minkova@unwe.bg

Get in touch →

ORCID 0009-0001-2209-1033